News
Polars 2.1 outperforms DuckDB 2.0 on large dataset
On a 23 GB dataset with 2 GB RAM, Polars 2.1 completed processing in 438 seconds, nearly twice as fast as DuckDB 2.0’s 837 seconds, while DuckDB added client‑server and AI features.
News
On a 23 GB dataset with 2 GB RAM, Polars 2.1 completed processing in 438 seconds, nearly twice as fast as DuckDB 2.0’s 837 seconds, while DuckDB added client‑server and AI features.